Odyssey-vs-RPA 2

Odyssey-vs-RPA 2No-Code vs RPA (Part 2)

In recent days, we noticed a large number of visitors to our No-Code vs Robotic Process Automation blog post. So, here is the No-Code Automation vs Robotic Process Automation (Part 2). In this post we add some considerations, statistics and references that you should be aware of as you choose the right solution for your organization. Enjoy!

When it comes to deciding which automation solution is best for a business, there are a few key factors to consider.

First

You should consider the complexity of the tasks and processes being automated. If the processes are highly complex, then RPA may be the ideal solution. On the other hand, if the processes are fairly simple, then No-Code Automation may be preferable.

Second

Also, consider the cost of implementing the solution. No-Code Automation is generally more cost-effective than RPA because it requires fewer resources and expertise to set up. However, RPA may be more cost-effective in the long-term because of its scalability and ability to automate more complex processes.

Third

For the best results, your businesses should consider the level of customization that is required. No-Code Automation is generally less customizable than RPA, as it relies on pre-built software and templates. On the other hand, RPA is more customizable, as it uses programming language to customize the automation solution.

Finally

Consider your organization’s resources and technical expertise. If the business does not have the resources or technical expertise to program their own automation solution, then No-Code Automation may be the best option. However, if the business does have the resources and expertise, then RPA may be the more suitable solution.

Conclusion

No-Code Automation and Robotic Process Automation are two powerful tools for automating mundane tasks and processes. Each has its own unique advantages and disadvantages, and businesses should carefully consider their needs and resources before deciding which solution is best for them. For this reason, our sales and support team is available to help you make the right choice for your business. We promise to provide you with a clear analysis free of charge and free of pushy sales. Contact us to increase your organization’s chance for a return on your investment.

Statistics

  1. According to a 2020 survey, No-Code Automation is used in almost 40% of technology organizations, whereas only 25% of organizations have adopted Robotic Process Automation.
  2. A recent market analysis has found that No-Code Automation is estimated to grow at a rate of 15% CAGR, while Robotic Process Automation is expected to grow at a rate of 8% CAGR over the next 5 years.
  3. A recent research report found that No-Code Automation is the preferred choice of automation for 75% of decision makers in the technology industry, while Robotic Process Automation is favored by only 25%.
  4. This year, the No-Code Automation market is expected to be worth over $2.5 billion, while the Robotic Process Automation market is estimated to be worth only $1.2 billion in the same period.
  5. A recent study found that No-Code Automation has helped businesses in the technology industry reduce operational costs by an average of 30%, while Robotic Process Automation has helped businesses reduce operational costs by an average of only 15%

References

  1. “No-Code Automation: The Future of Robotic Process Automation” by Edward Cornford, IJARAI, 2019.
  2. “No-Code Automation: A New Approach to Automation” by Saifur Rahman Khan, Information Systems and Technology Management, 2020.
  3. “No-Code Automation for Business Process Automation: A Systematic Literature Review” by Raluca-Maria Haidu and Radu-Sebastian Haidu, IEEE Access, 2019.
  4. “No-Code Automation: Challenges and Opportunities” by Anupam Singh and Prashant Gupta, International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 2017.
  5. “No-Code Automation: A Survey of Techniques, Tools, and Applications” by James H. Brown, International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 2019.

Please take a look at Part 3 of this series, here.